Student Appeals
Student Behaviour (Academic and Non-Academic Misconduct)
Students of the University of Regina (the “University”) are expected to conduct themselves responsibly and with propriety both in their studies and in their general behaviour, and are expected to abide by all policies and regulations of the University. Misconduct, which may be academic (that is, in academic studies) or non-academic (in general behaviour), is subject to disciplinary action.
The below information is to provide a summary to students on appropriate conduct at the University. Please refer to the Regulations Governing Discipline for Academic Misconduct for a complete description on appropriate conduct.
Principle of Progressive Discipline
Actions taken and penalties imposed when misconduct has been determined will be guided by the principle of progressive discipline. To that end penalties assigned and actions taken will:
- Normally increase in severity for second and subsequent acts of misconduct.
- Take into account the severity of the misconduct.
- Educate with respect to correct behaviour and the consequences of future misconduct.
Academic Misconduct
Cheating in examinations, plagiarism (using others' ideas without acknowledgement), giving false information to University staff to gain an academic advantage, downloading an assignment from the Internet, and writing an examination on behalf of someone else are examples of academic misconduct. All forms of academic misconduct are unacceptable in the University, and are subject to penalties. For more information on the complete list of definitions and actions that are considered to be academic misconduct, refer the Regulations Governing Discipline for Academic and Non-Academic Misconduct.
Penalties for Academic Misconduct
Determination of the penalty for acts of misconduct will be done on a case-by-case basis with consideration for similar previous incidents. In determining the appropriate penalty, consideration will also be given to the extent of the misconduct, whether there have been previous cases of misconduct, and other mitigating or aggravating circumstances. Repeat cases of academic misconduct will normally result in more severe penalties.
Withdrawal from the University while an alleged violation is being investigated does not prevent the subsequent rendering of a disciplinary decision and assignment of a penalty if the misconduct is substantiated.
The possible penalties for an act of academic misconduct may include any one or more of the following, or another appropriate penalty at the discretion of the Dean:
- Reduction of a grade on an assignment, essay, report or examination
- Notation on the student’s file
- Zero credit on an assignment, essay, report or examination
- Reduction of a grade in a course
- Zero credit in a course
- A grade of XF (academic misconduct)
- Loss and/or repayment of scholarships and other awards
- Requirement to take a course in ethics
- Suspension or expulsion from a program
- Suspension or expulsion from the University
- Withholding or rescission of a credential
Penalties assigned for academic misconduct may be appealed to the Council Discipline Committee. More information on the Council Discipline Committee may be found below.
Non-Academic Misconduct
Consideration for others and respect for each person is a principal way of life within the university community. The basic behavioural philosophy of the University of Regina is that all students, academic staff, support staff and administrators must be able to work and study in an environment that is free from harassment, discrimination, and intimidation, that all members of the community are entitled to fair and humane treatment, and will conduct themselves appropriately, respectfully and responsibly.
A primary responsibility of the University is to provide its students with the opportunity for inquiry and the freedom to discuss and express one’s views openly without fear of retaliation, or abuse of person or property. These attributes are the foundation of good citizenship.
To this end, students have an obligation to act in a fair and respectful manner toward their peers, the faculty, staff, administration and the physical property of the University and others. Integrity in personal conduct, both on-campus and off-campus, are critical elements in achieving these goals. Violations of University regulations that have been adopted to protect the university community will be subject to disciplinary action.
Actions such as harassment or intimidation of another student or a member of the University's staff, disruption of classes, theft, damage to property, vandalism, and assault are considered non-academic misconduct. In addition to being subject to University penalties, some may incur criminal prosecution.
For more information on non-academic misconduct and a list of definitions and actions that are condicted to be non-academic misconduct, please refer to the Regulations Governing Discipline for Academic and Non-Academic Misconduct.
If you are a victim of an act of non-academic misconduct, please contact Protective Services at 306-585-4999. For an act of harassment, discrimination and conflict, please contact the Coordinator, Respectful University Services at respect.matters@uregina.ca.
Penalties for Acts of Non-Academic Misconduct
The possible penalties for an act of non-academic misconduct may include any one or more of the following, or another appropriate penalty at the discretion of the Associate Vice-President (Student Affairs).:
- Forfeiture of fees
- Restitution for damage
- Fines
- If not in violation of any collective bargaining agreement, University community service or remedial measures may be considered
- Alternative dispute resolution
- Loss of, and/or requirement to repay, scholarships or other awards
- Probation
- Eviction from residence
- Restriction of access or use of any University facilities, equipment or services
- Expulsion from the Co-op program
- Suspension
- Termination of any internship, practicum or research project, without any refund of fees
- Expulsion
- Exclusion from campus
Penalties assigned for non-academic misconduct may be appealed to the Council Discipline Committee. More information on the Council Discipline Committee may be found below.
Supporting Documents
Regulations Governing Discipline for Academic and Non-Academic Misconduct (PDF)
Academic Integrity Resources
The University of Regina has developed an Academic Integrity Hub that provides resources to students on the various types of misconduct and how to uphold the values of academic integrity.
Academic and Non-Academic Misconduct Holds (Disciplinary Holds)
A student who has committed or is under investigation for an act of academic misconduct or non-academic misconduct will have a hold placed on their student account. The hold remains on the student's account for 30-days following the decision letter by the faculty, federated college, or academic unit. If the student does not submit a formal request to appeal the decision of the faculty, federated college, or academic unit within the 30-days, the hold is automatically lifted from their account after 30-days. If the student wishes to appeal the decision, the hold remains on their account until a decision is reached following his/her appeal hearing.
During the hold period, a student is able to register for classes on their own but cannot obtain official and unofficial transcripts.
Removing a Disciplinary Hold
If a student does not wish to appeal the penalty that has been assigned, and would like the hold removed from the student account prior to the end of the 30-day period, the student may email Student.Appeals@uregina.ca requesting that the disciplinary hold be lifted.
Disciplinary holds cannot be lifted if an academic misconduct or non-academic misconduct decision has not be issued.
Appeals
Students have the right to appeal an academic action (RTD, MW, denied deferral). Students must submit their appeal in writing by the deadline specified by the faculty, federated college, or academic unit in their letter of notification.
An appeal of academic action has three potential outcomes:
- The action remains the same.
- The previous action is extended.
- The action is rescinded.
Students with an academic action of MW are not permitted to atten ore gister in classes during the appeals process. Class registrations may be cancelled by the students' faculty, federated college or academic unit.
An appeal of academic action is made to the designated authority as specific in the letter of notification. The appeal will be reviewed according to internal faculty, federated college, or academic unit procedures.
Once a decision has been rendered the designated authority will:
- Notify the student of the faculty, federated college, or academc unit decision on the appeal.
- Submit a request to the Registrar's Office to change the academic action if the outcome of the appeal requires a change.
- Copy the University Secretary on the decision.
Should a student not be satisifed with the appeal decision of the faculty, federated college, or academic unit, the student may appeal to the Council Committee on Student Appeals. More information on the Council Committee on Student Appeals may be found below.
Students may appeal the imposition or severity of a penalty for academic misconduct or non-academic misconduct to the Council Discipline Committee. Requests for a hearing must be submitted, in writing and within 30-days of the imposition of the penalty to:
More information on the Council Discipline Committee may be found below.
Appeal Committees
The Council Committee on Student Appeals ensures that the Council has appointed a committee that will hear and decide upon all appeals by students or others on academic matters in connection with any faculty of the University. With the exception of matters heard by the Council Discipline Committee, all appeals and applications by students regarding faculty decisions (including RTD's) will be heard by the Council Committee on Student Appeals.
Grounds for an appeal to the Council Committee on Student Appeals should be based on one or more of the following:
- There is additional relevant information which was not considered at the Faculty level.
- There was a problem in procedure at the Faculty level.
- The substance of the case was not considered correctly at the Faculty level. For example, relevant rules and regulations were applied incorrectly.
Formal request for appeal must be submitted in writing within 30-days from the date of the faculty, federated college, or academc unit decision to:
Procedures of the Council Committee on Student Appeals
Terms of Reference (PDF)
Student Submission Guide (PDF)
Annual Reports
CCSA Annual Report to EofC (2024-2025) (PDF)
CCSA Annual Report to EofC (2023-2024) (PDF)
CCSA Annual Report to EofC (2022-2023) (PDF)
CCSA Annual Report to EofC (2021-2022) (PDF)
CCSA Annual Report to EofC (2020-2021) (PDF)
The Council Discipline Committee ensures that the University enacts and enforces regulations respecting the discipline of students (the “Discipline Regulations”) in accordance with the principles of natural justice. It is also the body responsible for hearing all student appeals with respect to decisions of academic and non-academic misconduct.
Grounds for an appeal of a disciplinary decision to the Council Discipline Committee are based on one or more of the following:
- There is additional relevant information which was not considered by the Investigating Dean or the Associate Vice-President (Student Affairs) (in both cases, the University Officer).
- There was a problem in procedure during the investigation.
- The substance of the case was not considered correctly by the University Officer. For example, relevant rules and regulations were applied incorrectly.
- Even if relevant rules and regulations were applied correctly, the resulting decision is unfair or unreasonable in the circumstances.
The Committee provides a full hearing. If the finding is substantiated, the penalty assigned by the Committee may be the same as, or less or more severe than, the original penalty.
Formal request for appeal must be submitted in writing within 30-days from the date of the academic misconduct or non-academic misconduct decision to:
Petitions to the Council Discipline Committee
Individuals seeking permission to apply for re-admission to the University following an expulsion must submit an application for re-admission and a letter of petition to Student.Appeals@uregina.ca.
Information on petitioning for permission to re-apply to the University, may be found in Section B of the Council Discipline Committee Terms of Reference.
Supporting Documents
Terms of Reference (PDF)
Regulations Governing Discipline for Academic and Non-Academic Misconduct (PDF)
Student Submission Guide (PDF)
Student Petition Guide (PDF)
Annual Reports
CDC Annual Report to EofC (2024-2025) (PDF)
CDC Annual Report to EofC (2023-2024) (PDF)
CDC Annual Report to EofC (2022-2023) (PDF)
CDC Annual Report to EofC (2021-2022) (PDF)
CDC Annual Report to EofC (2020-2021) (PDF)
The Senate Appeals Committee is the committee established by the Senate to hear and decide upon all student appeals from the decisions of the Council Discipline Committee and the Council Committee on Student Appeals on matters of academic misconduct, non-academic misconduct and academic matters in connection with any faculty of the university.
The Senate Appeals Committee will uphold the decision of the Committees being appealed from unless the appellant can demonstrate that the decision was contrary to the evidence presented or manifestly unfair to the appellant.
The onus is on the appellant to demonstrate that the decision of the Committee was manifestly unfair or contrary to the evidence presented. No witnesses are permitted and no new evidence is entertained.
Formal request for appeal must be submitted in writing within 30-days from the date of the Committee decision to:
Senate Appeals Committee Procedures
Anonymous Reporting of Academic Misconduct
Anyone may report academic misconduct. If you believe a student has engaged in academic misconduct, it is best to report this to your instructor for further investigation. However, there might be reasons that you prefer to instead report potential academic misconduct through this website.
When reporting academic misconduct, please be sure to include enough details to begin an investigation. For example, these details might include:
- The name of the class or classes where the misconduct occurred
- Name of the student(s) who you believe have engaged in misconduct
- The estimated date(s) of the alleged academic misconduct
-
Details of academic misconduct (i.e. cheating on a final exam, purchase of an essay paper, unauthorized sharing of materials, etc.)
Below is a fillable web form. Fields marked with an asterisk are required to be completed. If you wish to remain anonymous, please do not enter your name and personal contact information. However, please be aware that the ability to pursue an investigation will be impacted by the amount of information provided through this reporting form.