Ethical Considerations, Risks and Limitations
Ethical Considerations
Academic and Research Integrity
The fast evolution of GenAI has created new challenges to upholding the principles of academic integrity and research ethics in educational institutions.
Academic integrity, a cornerstone of the academia, is defined by the International Centre for Academic Integrity as a commitment to six fundamental values: honesty, trust, fairness, respect, responsibility, and courage. These values are essential to safeguarding the quality of education and research within academia and ensuring that the work produced serves the broader public good with integrity and reliability. The antithesis of academic integrity is "academic misconduct," which includes cheating, plagiarism, unauthorized use of assistance in completing course assignments, fabricating references etc. The University of Regina is committed to upholding the highest standards of academic integrity. Faculty and students are required to abide by the University’s academic integrity regulations as set out in “Regulations Governing Discipline for Academic and Non-academic Misconduct” and incorporated in the Student Code of Conduct and Right to Appeal section of the University’s Academic Calendar.
The University’s online Academic Integrity Hub provides guidance and resources on academic integrity for faculty and students.
As universities continue to adapt to the widespread availability and popularity of GenAI, students, faculty, and staff must keep lines of communication open and familiarize themselves with developing and evolving policies and guidelines.
For current guidelines on GenAI use and academic integrity at the U of R, review the instructor and student resource pages of this GenAI Hub.
To refresh their understanding of research ethics, researchers should review the University’s Research and Scholarly Integrity Policy (GOV-022-025)
Intellectual Property, Fair Use, and Creative Commons
Generative AI models rely heavily on large amounts of data during their training process and make use of that same material when producing outputs, often with human input but without oversight. This lack of oversight makes it essential to consider the ethical implications related to copyright and the rights of creators that may have been ignored during the training of these models.
Copyright law is partly designed to protect the rights of creators and their ability to control how their works are used and distributed. Using copyrighted material without permission or compensation can undermine these rights and harm creators through a disruption in income, misrepresentations or distortions of their original work, or damage to their reputation and integrity.
However, maintaining a balance between user rights and the maintenance of a rich public sphere where ideas and creative works can easily be accessed, shared, and discussed are also priorities in copyright. Overly restrictive practices can significantly impede access, stifle innovation, and limit the development of technologies. Sometimes, this means providing exceptions and limitations to copyright, such as fair use and fair dealing, which allow users to access, use, and sometimes even modify copyrighted works under certain conditions.
Responsible and Ethical Use
In the context of a university setting, using GenAI responsibly means considering the following factors:
- Respect for creators’ rights: Strive to use GenAI models that primarily draw from open resources and the public domain (i.e., works that are not protected by copyrights), reducing the risk of copyright infringement and/or GenAI models that acknowledge the creator or author of the work used.
- Balancing user rights and access: Promote practices that support both innovation and access while ensuring the rights of creators are respected.
- Contextual considerations: Evaluate specific cases of GenAI use to determine whether it aligns with ethical, legal, and institutional expectations with respect to intellectual property.
Relevant Resources
University of Regina Policy on Use of Copyrighted Materials
Dr. John Archer Library Information on Copyrights
Creative Commons
There are important considerations around GenAI and Creative Commons (CC) license.
Understanding CC Licenses and Generative AI - Creative Commons discusses how CC licenses relate to GenAI, focusing on the legal and ethical issues of using CC licensed works for AI training and the application of CC licenses to GenAI outputs.
Equity, Access to AI, and Accessibility
Like other major technological innovations, the development and growing impact of GenAI have also raised concerns regarding equity and access (i.e., who controls the technology, who has access, and who is excluded).
AI systems require vast amounts of investments in the infrastructure needed for the training and operation of these systems. The infrastructure supporting AI systems includes computer hardware, specialized data centres, physical facilities with advanced cooling systems to house the data centres, high-capacity energy supply to power the data centres, and fast and reliable network connectivity. In market economies, there is usually a tendency for capital to concentrate in smaller number of companies when huge investments are required.
From the user perspective, access to GenAI requires high-speed, stable internet connection and up-to-date devices (desktop/laptop computer or mobile devices). While there are open-access, fee free GenAI systems, the more advanced GenAI models are subscription-based. Thus, there are cost-barriers to accessing GenAI, in particular, more advanced models; regions and communities without stable digital connectivity are also disadvantaged.
Accessibility
With respect to equity, it is also important to take into consideration the fact that GenAI offers important features that can improve accessibility for individuals with physical or learning disabilities, such as speech-to-text and text to speech tools, closed captioning, capability to describe visual images etc. AI agents can also be trained for personalized tutoring to support learners with learning disabilities.
Indigenous Knowledges
The proliferating applications of GenAI across many sectors call for increased critical examination of its multi-faceted impact on Indigenous communities. When examining the impact of GenAI on Indigenous communities around the world, it is important to consider real concerns as well as potential benefits.
Misrepresentation of cultural practices
- Risk of perpetuating biases, inaccuracies, and cultural distortion if AI models are not trained properly on Indigenous data and with Indigenous involvement.
- Threats to Indigenous data sovereignty, intellectual property rights, and environmental impacts from AI development.
- Threats to more culturally responsive teaching practices that ensure meaningful capacity building and inclusion rather than tokenistic gestures.
Misappropriation of traditional or sacred imagery
- Misuse of generative AI to appropriate Indigenous cultures and knowledge systems without consent, highlighting the importance of Indigenous data sovereignty, ethical AI development, and increasing Indigenous voices in shaping these technologies.
Cultural appropriation and copyright infringement
- Theft and appropriation of Indigenous intellectual property, Indigenous art, and cultural identities by AI systems trained on data scraped from the internet can lead to further exploitation and marginalization of Indigenous peoples' cultures, knowledge systems, and lived realities.
Indigenous language reclamation and intergenerational learning
- Gen-AI language tutoring to help practice an Indigenous language.
Cultural preservation
- Digital archiving tools that can organize and classify photos, recordings, and documents under Indigenous governance .
- Restoration of damaged historical materials (recordings, photos etc.) with GenAI assistance .
- GenAI assistant interactive experiences grounded in Indigenous cultural teachings .
Indigenous-led environmental stewardship
- AI/GenAI systems developed to complement Indigenous knowledges in managing natural resources and monitoring weather patterns.
Environmental Considerations
There are significant concerns about the environmental impact of AI as the development and deployment of AI systems involve vast amounts of energy and clean water consumption. At the same time, AI can be utilized to serve a variety of environmental sustainability objectives.
Energy consumption during AI model training
The process of developing and training AI models requires significant computational power, which in turn leads to extraordinarily high energy consumption.
Carbon footprint and greenhouse gas emissions
The energy-intensive nature of AI development and deployment results in a substantial carbon footprint, contributing to global greenhouse gas emissions.
Water-intensive processes
Generative AI requires vast amounts of water for manufacturing microchips and cooling data centres.
Electronic waste
The development and increasing use of AI technologies contribute to the growth of electronic waste and thus air, water, and soil pollution.
Consequence of mining materials
The hardware components necessary for AI technologies rely on huge amounts of copper and rare earth elements, the mining of which contaminates soil and groundwater with an array of toxic chemicals.
Biodiversity monitoring and protection
AI can help analyze large datasets to monitor species populations, habitats, and ecosystems more efficiently.
Climate change mitigation
AI can help optimize renewable energy systems, smart grids, industrial processes, and energy-efficient buildings, reducing waste, energy consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions.
Precision agriculture
AI can be used to optimize farming practices, reducing the need for water, pesticides, and fertilizers.
Waste management and recycling
AI can help optimize waste collection, sorting, and recycling processes, reducing the amount of waste heading to landfills or polluting the environment.
Ecosystem restoration and conservation planning
AI can analyze large environmental datasets and satellite imagery to identify areas in need of restoration, map ecosystem boundaries, and help plan and prioritize conservation efforts in a more data-driven and efficient manner.
Risks of GenAI
Datafication is the process of transforming all aspects of our lives, including our behaviours and attributes, into measurable digital data that can be collected, stored, analyzed, and used for various purposes.
Datafication is driven by the widespread use of digital technologies, sensors, and connected devices, raising important questions about privacy, ethics, and security. To ensure responsible data collection, usage, and protection, we need appropriate legislation to establish safeguards and guidelines. However, GenAI users should be mindful that in many jurisdictions, online privacy legislation may be absent, incomplete, or out-of-date, so they may have limited recourse to combat bad actors and cyber criminals who use data for nefarious activities.
Specific privacy concerns include:
- data theft: data taken without consent;
- data persistence: data outliving the humans who produced it;
- data overreach: data used beyond the limits in which consent was originally given;
- data spillage: data collected on persons who were not the original target; and
- data reidentification: data that has been un-anonymized.
GenAI systems are often referred to as a ‘black box,’ meaning that there is uncertainty about how user data and inputs are used by the companies that own these systems.
Assumed uses include:
- additional system training where user data and inputs may be used to further train and refine the AI models;
- consumer profiling where companies analyze user data to create profiles of their users so they can tailor their services and provide personalized experiences; and
- customer service training where customer service teams study user data to improve support and service quality.
However, these and other uses may not be clearly disclosed to users, including whether information will be shared with or sold to third parties.
Given the lack of transparency around how data is used, users should be very cautious about the nature of information that they share with these systems and should not share any sensitive data (for example, personal, propriety or copyrighted information, health information).
For the University of Regina’s relevant policy, please visit: Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy | University of Regina
From a security perspective, GenAI increases the potential for creating realistic scams. While malicious actors and cybercriminals have long used the internet and other technologies to deceive, manipulate, or dox (i.e., make public private or identifying information with the intention to inflict harm) individuals or organizations, GenAI makes it even easier for them to cause harm through more sophisticated and convincing tactics.
For instance, GenAI can enable the production of highly convincing voice clones that mimic a target individual, which can then be used in various scams. These voice clones may be used in romance scams, where a scammer pretends to be a potential romantic partner and tricks the victim into sending money or personal information. Similarly, job scams can involve impersonating a hiring manager or recruiter to gain access to sensitive information or even request payment for fake job opportunities.
GenAI's ability to produce large volumes of convincing content rapidly poses an increased threat as it enables cybercriminals to scale up their malicious activities. As a result, individuals, businesses, and governments must adapt by implementing enhanced security measures, such as multi-factor authentication and increased user awareness and education
Limitations of GenAI
Bias and Misinformation
Generative AI is known to reproduce biased content in its outputs. These biases are inherited from its training data (texts, images, videos etc.). Some AI also has deliberately built in biases intended to promote particular agendas. In other words, if the training data contains biases, such as stereotypes or unequal representations of certain groups, these biases are learned and perpetuated by the AI.
AI systems can, therefore, amplify existing societal biases, which can result in unfair treatment and discrimination in various applications, from hiring practices to law enforcement. To address and mitigate biases, developers must carefully select training data and continuously monitor and adjust algorithms used. Users must critically evaluate AI outputs to ensure transparency and fairness.
Societal Bias
Societal and cultural prejudices existing in the real world, which can be reflected and perpetuated in AI systems. For instance, societal biases surrounding gender roles or racial stereotypes can be unwittingly incorporated into AI applications, leading to discriminatory outcomes.
Data Bias
Biases in datasets GenAI is trained on. If the data contains biases, such as under-representing or overrepresenting certain groups, the AI can learn and perpetuate these biases. For instance, if a facial recognition system is trained using predominantly lighter-skinned individuals, it may be less accurate when identifying individuals with darker skin tones.
Algorithmic Bias
Errors and/or exclusionary practices in the algorithms used to build AI systems that introduce or amplify existing biases. Algorithmic biases occur when AI developers fail to consider diverse perspectives, cultural contexts, or ethical considerations during the development process.
The potential of GenAI to amplify biases can lead to distorted, incorrect, or harmful representations of race, religion, culture, class, sex, and gender and thus further exacerbate discriminatory practices and prejudices. Various AI systems are also known to create politically biased output.
Addressing these biases involves carefully selecting and balancing training data, critically evaluating AI outputs, and making necessary adjustments to ensure fairness and accuracy.
Misinformation and Disinformation
GenAI makes it easier to generate and disseminate misinformation and disinformation by enabling the creation or fabrication of credible looking/sounding content, such as deepfakes, voice clones, and manipulated content or images.
"Misinformation" is incorrect or misleading information that is often spread without the intention to deceive.
“Disinformation” is false or misleading information that is deliberately deceptive and intentionally spread.
Protections against GenAI Facilitated Disinformation and Misinformation
We can take several proactive steps to mitigate and limit the spread of misinformation and disinformation through the use of GenAI:
- Develop AI literacy: Stay informed about AI technologies, their capabilities, and their limitations. This understanding can help users identify and address potential issues.
- Critically evaluate AI outputs: Be cautious when consuming AI-generated content and look for potential biases and inaccuracies.
- Advocate for fairness in AI applications: Hold AI developers and organizations accountable so that they are transparent about their algorithms, data sources, and potential biases.
- Support responsible AI development: Encourage the adoption of ethical guidelines and best practices in AI development, such as incorporating diverse perspectives and regularly auditing AI systems for biases.